The Most Important Class
The Most Important Class
Published on October 27th, 2009 @ 10:49:59 am , using 1110 words, 747 views
by Bob Flaws
I believe the single most important class in our entry-level education in Chinese medicine is basic theory. This class is the foundation upon which everything else is built. If you've ever built a house, shed, barn, or even sand castle, not to mention a sky-scraper, you know that if you're off in building the base or foundation, the whole edifice will eventually topple. Each successive level you go upward, the more pronounced the initial error becomes. While you can try to correct the error at higher levels, ultimately the real fix is to go back and start over again from the beginning, from the foundation level. In Chinese medical education, basic theory is exactly like this. If students learn wrong theory (because of improper technical terminology or teacher ignorance or confusion), then this is going to have huge repercussions in terms of correct diagnosis and treatment planning later on. Unfortunately, Honora and I see this all the time in students from a wide variety of North American schools.
...
I understand that our schools have limited resources, and it is often tempting to staff beginning courses with recent graduates or recently arrived immigrants. The material may seem easy and not very sexy. So schools often chose to reserve their "big guns," their older, more experienced, more famous teachers for their advanced classes. As the thinking goes, these advanced classes need the advanced knowledge, skills, and experience of their most advanced teachers, and this is not wrong. However, basic theory class also requires the same advanced skill-set if only administrators really understood. Instead, in the case of recent graduates, they simply have not studied and practiced the medicine long enough to be really clear about what they are doing. In the case of recent, non-native English-speaking immigrants, they may know the medicine very well, but they may not know how to express this knowledge in philologically correct English. Further, it is my experience that the basic theory teacher must personally read medical Chinese. You simply cannot really know and understand this medicine the way Chinese do until or unless you can read this material in its original source language. This requirement may make it even more difficult for schools to find truly qualified teachers of Chinese medical theory.
However, difficult or not, unless basic theory is taught correctly, students are not going to learn the rest of Chinese medicine in a correct, authentic way. (There's that word again.) Further, it is important that all the teachers of core, foundational classes teach to the same standards of information. I can't tell you how many times students tell me that they've heard one explanation or theory in one class only to be told by their next teacher something completely different. This lack of consistency is extremely deleterious in the teaching of what is essentially a practical skill. We are not talking about differences of opinion about a painting or a poem here. We are talking about a consistent body of theory and technique which is meant to be put into practice on other living beings. Errors in those theories and techniques may cause the continuance or even worsening of the patient's suffering or, in extreme cases, may lead to permanent disability or premature death.
When I was a student at the Shanghai College (now University) of Traditional Chinese Medicine, I would sometime see my teachers going over their lecture scripts. First of all, they had such scripts. Secondly, they agreed as a group on what those scripts would say. Therefore, there was uniformity and agreement in information from teacher to teacher, class to class. If, by chance, a teacher was sick one day, another teacher could step right in and give the same essential lecture as the missing teacher. I agree that hearing a lecture read verbatim is usually very boring. However, teachers can work out as a group what is going to be taught without necessarily being tied to written scripts. In Chinese, Chinese medicine is written and spoken about in a very standard, formulaic way. Using those same standard formulas, albeit in English, allows the teacher to remain faithful to the tradition while still being free to embroider around those key statements of fact in a personally satisfying and engaging, even entertaining, way.
In my experience, most schools rationalize their non-standard presentation of "Oriental" medicine as exposing students to a diversity of opinions and techniques. They are "broadening students' horizons." However, the truth is that the schools are usually hiring anyone they can at a price they can afford. The fruit of that practice is confusion and the lack of confidence that is a by-product of that confusion.
So what to do if you are a student at such a school and can't transfer to a better one? My recommendation is to buy three books. The first is Nigel Wiseman & Feng Ye's A Practical Dictionary of Chinese Medicine. In this dictionary, you will find standard, technically accurate explanations of all the key terms and theories of Chinese medicine. In a pinch, you could pretty much learn all of Chinese medicine from this one book. The second is Fundamentals of Chinese Medicine by the East Asian Medical Studies Society (i.e., Nigel Wiseman et al.). This is a basic theory book that uses the same philologically correct translational terminology at the Practical Dictionary. And the third is to buy my own Statements of Fact in Traditional Chinese Medicine. This is a listing of all the key statements of fact you need to memorize to really think like a Chinese doctor and make this system work the way Chinese do. Armed with these three books, you can learn on your own basic Chinese medical theory regardless of what is happening in your classroom(s). Then, if you really want to rocket to the head of the pack, begin learning to read medical Chinese. This will help you immediately in class, and it will help you every day in clinic for the rest of your professional life.
What to do if you've graduated from school and realize that you haven't learned the basics the way you should've? My recommendation is that, on your own, you should buy the same three books and also begin learning to read medical Chinese for yourself. For years, every time I had reviewed all the Chinese medicine I had learned up to that time, I would start again right at the beginning and go through it all over again, year after year after year. Basic theory is that important, and it's never too late to lay the proper foundation.
Copyright Blue Poppy Press, 2009. All rights reserved.
7 comments
Our theory class was/is taught by Dr. Yubin Lu from Shandong University @ AAAOM in MN. So I would think that is a strong background. We used Maciocia's books as the recommended text but mostly class notes, is there a critique of FCM that I am not aware of in regards to the above post?
I appreciate the regards to the classics, authenticity, and being literate in Chinese Medicine. But none of those topics build a practice and that is the biggest challenge I think we face here. A bit of a conundrum, where to put time and energy?
This is exactly what happens in many schools, at least the ones I attended. I had some good teachers but I also had teachers that could not explain basic rudimentary theory. One for lack of language skills, the other, not knowing the information themselves. There where only two students at my school besides my self and one teacher that owned Nigel’s practical dictionary. This was just shameful, these are institutions which supposedly pride themselves in providing top level education, (at least they advertise it that way) and charge the highest tuitions in the world, but they can’t seem to get their act together. Many of my teachers would say, once you get out of school that is when you really start learning Chinese medicine. Was that just a copout, I would figure if you get indebt for 50,or 60 thousand or 100,000 like some of my friends, you should get the best foundation in anything! AS far as the classics and authenticity goes, if you do not have a rudimentary understanding of those, then there is no practice, and then you become a charlatan that professes to have an understanding of a system of knowledge that you really don’t, and even worst try to sell it to an unsuspecting public. If this is not malpractice, I don’t know what is.
Re Dr. Lu at AAAOM in MN, I'm sure Dr. Lu knows his/her subject very well. However, without hearing him/her lecture, I would be concerned about their ability to communicate what they know in English. Until or unless you can read this stuff for yourself in Chinese, you don't actually know how true to the Chinese your teacher is. It may sound good in English, but there may be subtle nevertheless important technical differences from the original Chinese. Sorry, won't comment on FCM in public. What I can say is that GM doesn't personally read Chinese.
Recently, I was informed by another practitioner that it is perfectly acceptable to prescribe Wen Bing formulas for patients diagnosed with Shang Han because "wind-cold transforms into wind-heat quickly in Colorado." I smiled as I had a flashback of one of my own instructors saying (as she was apt to do), "You need to go back and study more."
That being said, I am not entirely sold that having the ability to read medical Chinese will solve this problem completely, although I do agree that it will help students and practitioners who will actually learn to do so. I would say that a lack of motivation to study on the behalf of the student is equally, if not more of a problem, not to mention the practice of schools throwing out a number of test questions in order to pass more students through the program to stay afloat financially. I agree that medical Chinese illiteracy is a problem, I just don't think it is THE problem.
For the record, my alma mater, SWAC Boulder, had a native Chinese speaker teach the majority of our theory and diagnosis classes. He also required Wiseman's texts for all of his classes with the exception of internal medicine.
Recently, PMPH has put out the Basics Study Guide (name? Sorry, its at the office) .I am very impressed with it and will recommend as our basic text for the class. One problem in California, is of course, the State Board requirement of GM. What I fear about making agreement among teachers is that this becomes the standard.
The other point is that in all my discussions with my Chinese colleagues, the issue of translation is of very little interest to them. It is your language they tell me use what you want. My own Basics teacher, years ago at SAMRA, Chris Ting was great (I can assume she read Chinese) taught straight out of GM FCM without hesitation. What bugs the students is that I have to disagree with FCM and explain why. Especially with the bloated new edition there are important disagreements that are subtle if not incomprehensible to the beginner. Sometimes I feel like its explaining to a 5 year old, why Mommy and Daddy no longer live together. Just when they got the parent thing together they get hit with that. (excuse the analogy :-) )
I do require that they read Statements of Facts and each semester have projects out of the book that makes them read the entire text. One student said, "Statements of Fact has become my new best friend". Really. (I also require it for a Principals of Treatment class which I call Basics on Steroids.)
The issue of clarity and ambiguity is big in this class. it is an issue of my teaching skills, the texts and the material of the medicine. Material is in quotes. The Basics are the first three weeks of Yin and Yang and Five Elements and substances. What I try to get across is that these are not "building blocks" or "Foundations" of the medicine but the core issues to which everything else always circles back to. My teaching skill comes down to explaining to absolute beginners that the first three weeks are deep, not easily digested and have them clearly understand the importance of that.
The really confused I will direct towards the Web with the caveat that it is Too Simple.
A lot to say....
Thanks….
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.


